So it's a bit like responsive web design (it loads lighter images/content to speed up load time and reduce CPU %)? I'll try adopting freezing & let you know how it goes. Personally, I don't do it this way as I tend to work within the limits of my machine and do all the mixing within the project, just at the very end of production. It also shifts focus from wanting to make further edits but if you do need to, you can just export the stems again and re-import into your "mixing" project and have all the same processing applied (being cautious about any automation) What you then do is either reload those as a new project in Live if you like to stay in Live but many will take these to a more "traditional" linear DAW where they can then focus purely on the mixing side where you now have all the power available for processing the sound to the final mix. That will generate a wav file for each separate track often referred to as "stems". You can choose in the Live Export options to render instead of the Master, "All Tracks": Should sound identical to how it was tracked. Freeze will just create an in place render and place all the devices "offline" so a "representation" of that track is played instead. Thanks!įreeze can be useful when you are producing and a heavy track is mostly done but takes a lot of processing. Once you get pass lets say 6db of compression is when it doesnt sound as good. I love it for 1 to 3db of compression as its very transparent. When you put L1 on, it changes the sound as well as 元. These options seem like good suggestions. Well, believe it or nah, L2 is the cleanest of them all. Tue 10:37 - Is there a risk with rendering tracks where you can't go back and easily make changes? Or when it is rendered, is it dynamic? Same question for freezing. It's about working smarter, not just increasing the CPU and demanding more efficiency for the way you choose to work, look into how seasoned professionals work, i'm not one of them but I take notes from their books. Render tracks out and mix/master stems instead of doing all within your production environment.Ī reason some will mix in a different program, apart from a more desirable workflow, you can drop all the load from synths and track plugins and switch to mixing plugins and devote all the processing for the master section. Load is how many CPU cycles all your software and plugins will allow for, latency is the delay in time needed for plugins to calculate their process. To achieve this, use Pro-L 2 on the stem channel, while feeding the original (unmastered, unlimited) master to its side chain input. Any ideas?ĭepends on system and specs (not stated). This can be very useful for stem mastering, when you need to deliver individual stems that have been processed with the exact same limiting as the original master. There has to be a way around this for producers. Mon 5:09 - When I add Ozone 9 on Master, my CPU goes from about 50% to 110% and causes severe latency where sound is almost inaudible.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |